Legal Opinion

Bernard v. Wisconsin Automobile Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1933PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed November 9, 1932:

Wickhem, J.

The facts relating to the collision out of which this accident arose are fully set forth in the case of Bernard v. Jennings, heretofore referred to, and need not be repeated here. There are several assignments of error, but in the view the court takes of the case it will be necessary to discuss only one of them.

Defendant contends that the provisions of the insurance policy' preclude any recovery for damages arising by reason of the death of Bernard. This contention is based upon the fact that Bernard was an employee of the named…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Drewek v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Bachhuber v. BoosalisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Bro v. Standard Accident Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Fanslau v. Federal Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Stransky v. KousekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WachsmithWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Pearson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Birrenkott v. Mc ManamaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Continental Casualty Co. v. PierceMississippi Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. v. TollefsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API