Legal Opinion
Locke v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided April 12, 1938PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The respondent, General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd., on July 9, 1932, issued the policy in question to its corespondent, Harry Larson, owner of the automobile involved in the collision in question. The policy contained the following provision:
“B. Additional Assureds. The insurance provided by this policy is so extended as to be available, in the same manner and under the same provisions as it is available to the named assured, to any person or persons while riding in or legally operating any of the automobiles described in the declarations or to any person, firm or…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Drewek v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- American Automobile Insurance v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
- Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. SandersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Stenbom v. Brown-Corliss Engine Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Bro v. Standard Accident Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Norris v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. De MaisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Rakestraw v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
- Hooper v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Harper v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.