Legal Opinion

Kiviniemi v. American Mutual Liability Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1930PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The appellant assigns as error that the court erred in the following particulars: (1) Not holding the driver of the automobile guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law. (2) Not holding the wife and daughter of the driver of the automobile so guilty as matter of law. (3) Permitting damages to be assessed to plaintiff Sanni for the injuries done by the second car. (4) Not holding the truck not covered by insurance. (5) Not permitting cross-examination of witnesses by the attorney of the company after examination by the attorney of the other defendants. (6) Trying the three cases…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Kellogg v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Fisher v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Campbell v. American Fire Insurance Co. of PhiladelphiaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Schumaker v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Caygill v. IpsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Butts v. WardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  3. New York Life Ins. Co. v. SilversteinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  4. Terry v. Mongin Insurance AgencyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Jeske v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API