Legal Opinion
Holland Supply Corp. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided June 11, 1936PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHudgins, J.
This writ of error brings before this court for construction, a provision in an automobile indemnity insurance policy, reading:
“(1) RISKS NOT ASSUMED BY THE COMPANY.
“The company shall not be liable, and no liability or obligation of any kind shall attach to the company for losses or damage;
“(E) Caused while the said automobile is being driven or operated by any person whatsoever * * * violating any law or ordinance as to age or driving license, * * *.”
The Holland Supply Corporation purchased from defendant an indemnity insurance contract covering a Chevrolet truck owned by it. On May 8,1934,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Messersmith v. . American Fidelity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. GuentherSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Rowe v. United Commercial Travelers Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- McMahon v. PearlmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ArghyrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
- Sneed v. Concord Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Myers v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- McCann v. Iowa Mutual Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.