Segall v. Ohio Casualty Co.

It is plaintiffs’ first contention that by the terms of secs. 204.33 (2) and 204.34 (2), Stats., they are entitled to recover upon the policy issued by the defendant to Charles Segall regardless of the rule recognized in Wick v. Wick, 192 Wis. 260, 212 N. W. 787, that a child may not recover from a parent for personal injuries caused by *381the parent’s negligence. The statutory provision identical in each subsection is as follows :

“No policy of insurance [or] agreement of indemnity . . . shall exclude from the coverage afforded or the provisions as to the benefits therein provided persons…