Legal Opinion
Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 18, 1955No. Appeal, No. 89PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Per Curiam,
This matter is before us on a motion to quash appeal and answer thereto. The appeal was not taken from a final appealable order. The order in this proceeding being interlocutory, it is not reviewable under *371section 1101 (a) of the Public Utility Law of May 28, 1937, P. L. 1053, Art. XI, §1101, 66 PS §1431. A further opinion will be filed at a later date.
July 21, 1955:
The appeal is quashed at the costs of appellant.
Opinion
Per Curiam,
The City of Pittsburgh appealed from the order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission dated January 24, 1955, at Complaint Docket Nos.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pennsylvania State Athletic Commission v. BrattonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Reed v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Laclede Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Baker v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Duquesne Light Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Philadelphia Transportation Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1958