Legal Opinion

McKean-Coffman v. Employment Division

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1992No. EAB 89-AB-1298; CA A62926; SC S37747PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

In this case under the Oregon Administrative Procedures Act (APA), petitioner successfully challenged her disqualification from unemployment compensation benefits. McKean-Coffman v. Employment Div., 312 Or 543, 824 P2d 410 (1992). Petitioner then sought an award of attorney fees pursuant to ORS 183.497(1), discussed post. This court first denied an award of fees without opinion; petitioner now seeks reconsideration of that decision. We grant reconsideration, but adhere to our former ruling.

ORS 183.497(1), the statute on which petitioner relies, provides:

“(1) In a judicial proceeding…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McKean-Coffman v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. McKean-Coffman v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Portland State University Chapter of the American Ass'n of University Professors v. Portland State UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  2. TVKO v. HowlandOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Atkinson v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Boytano v. FritzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Kiem to v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API