Legal Opinion

Cochran v. Connell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 8, 1981No. 79-3320-E-1, CA 19216PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Plaintiffs, as purchasers, brought this action to enforce an earnest money agreement for the sale of a parcel of real property in Jackson County. The property is an asset of 'the estate of George W. Learned. Defendant Faye Cochran is personal representative of the estate. Defendants Connell and Obenchain are heirs of the deceased. The court granted the heirs’ motion for summary judgment, and judgment was subsequently entered in favor of all defendants, 1 dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint and awarding defendants attorney fees. Plaintiffs appeal; we reverse.

The facts are undisputed. 2 On April…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fountain v. FilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Hoy v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. Garrison v. CookOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. All-States Leasing Co. v. Pacific Empire Land Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. Alpha Phi of Sigma Kappa v. KincaidOregon Supreme Court · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Eden Gate, Inc. v. D&L Excavating & Trucking, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. SpeerstraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Hiber v. Creditors Collection Service of Lincoln County, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Wilson v. Smurfit Newsprint Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. Mortgage Bancorporation v. New Hampshire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API