Legal Opinion

Gerken v. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 12, 1994No. 12533-5-III; 12709-5-IIIPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

Floyd E. Gerken was injured when the vehicle he was driving skidded onto the shoulder of the road and overturned. At the scene of the accident, he told a state trooper he swerved off the road to avoid hitting an unidentified vehicle that veered sharply into his lane. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance Company (MOE), which insured the vehicle, denied Mr. Gerken underinsured motorist coverage because he had not provided independent corroboration of the accident. Mr. Gerken brought a declaratory judgment action against MOE. On cross motions for summary judgment, the court ruled there was sufficient…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Hayseeds, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Cas.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Boeing Company v. Sierracin CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. American Star Insurance v. GriceWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Estate of Jordan v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  2. Anderson v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. Ernst Home Center, Inc. v. SatoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  4. Mailloux v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  5. Solnicka v. Safeco Ins. Co. of IllinoisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API