Legal Opinion

To v. State Farm Mutual Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1994No. CC 9012-08224; CA A72878; SC S40747PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*95GILLETTE, J.

This declaratory judgment action involves the statutorily required uninsured motorist coverage provided in a motor vehicle liability policy issued by defendant State Farm Mutual Insurance. Three persons asserted claims under that coverage for injuries sustained in an accident allegedly caused by a “phantom vehicle.” After defendant denied coverage because of the lack of evidence corroborating the claimants’ version of the accident, one of the claimants released his uninsured motorist claim against defendant. The remaining claimants then argued that the testimony of the releasing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Moore v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. ColtonOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Garrison v. CookOregon Supreme Court · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Vega v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. HvalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. Westwood Construction Co. v. Hallmark Inns & Resorts, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Loewen v. GalliganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Fox v. Country Mutual InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1998

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API