Legal Opinion
Malloy v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 24, 1992No. 91-88PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant Danny S. Malloy contends that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction of possession with intent to distribute cocaine, D.C.Code § 33-541(a)(l) (1988 Repl.). He admits possessing the drugs, but contends that because he was only the custodian of the drugs to be returned to the person who originally gave them to him, there was no proof of his specific intent to distribute the drugs. Viewing the evidence, as we must, in the light most favorable to the government, Langley v. United States, 515 A.2d 729, 731 (D.C.1986); Frendak v. United States, 408 A.2d 364, 370…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Frendak v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- United States v. William A. Raper, United States of America v. Eli B. Childs, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Patterson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
- Chambers v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Langley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pena v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
- Long v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Durham v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Shabazz v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Durham v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.