Legal Opinion
Durham v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 30, 1999No. 96-CF-743Published
1Opinion of the Court
743 A.2d 196 (1999)
Alfred DURHAM, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES, Appellee.
No. 96-CF-743.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Argued September 16, 1997.
Decided December 30, 1999.
Robert O. Goff, for appellant.
L. Jackson Thomas, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney at the time the brief was filed, and John R. Fisher, Thomas C. Black, Richard J. Nelson, and Maureen Bailey, Assistant United States Attorneys, were on the brief, for appellee.
Before TERRY and RUIZ, Associate Judges, and LONG, Associate Judge, Superior Court of the District of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Walter Swiderski and Maritza De Los SantosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Riggs National Bank of Washington, D.C. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Toliver v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.