Legal Opinion
Durham v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 30, 1999No. 96-CF-743PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LONG, Associate Judge:
Appellant raises two issues in his quest for a reversal of his convictions for distribution of cocaine (D.C.Code § 33-541(a)(l) (1993)) and possession with intent to distribute cocaine (“PWID”) (D.C.Code § 33-541(a)(1) (1993)). One issue focuses upon the trial court’s refusal to give a certain jury instruction that was based upon a novel “theory of the case.” The other issue embraces a fact-bound dispute over the admissibility of certain police testimony under the rubric of Toliver v. United States, 468 A.2d 958 (D.C.1983). Based upon the following analysis, we find no…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Walter Swiderski and Maritza De Los SantosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Toliver v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Montgomery v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McIntosh v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012
- Payne v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Rodriguez v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. Munoz-CastenedaColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Garcia v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.