Legal Opinion

Pena v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided August 12, 2004No. 555, 2003PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELE, Chief Justice.

A Superior Court jury convicted Jose Pena of various drug-related charges. Pena moved in Superior Court for a mistrial based on a repeated reference to a narcotics investigation by a State’s witness as the impetus for an initial traffic stop. Counsel for both parties had agreed before trial that the witness would not refer to the drug investigation because of its potentially prejudicial effect upon the jury. The trial judge denied the motion after giving cautionary instructions to the witness and jury-

After reviewing the record, we find that the trial judge acted…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dawson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  2. Steckel v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
  3. Zimmerman v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  4. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  5. Malloy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Revel v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  3. Phillips v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017
  4. Phillips v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017
  5. Banther v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API