Shabazz v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
Under the so-called “addict exception” to the District of Columbia’s mandatory-minimum drug sentencing statute, D.C.Code § 33-541(c)(2) (1988), a defendant may be eligible for a lesser sentence if, among other prerequisites, he or she “has not been previously convicted in any jurisdiction in the United States for knowingly or intentionally ... distributing ... a controlled substance....” The appeal before us presents the issue whether a Virginia conviction of distribution “as an accommodation” is a disqualifying conviction under this provision.1
On November 20, 1989,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gooding v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Chambers v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Heacock v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Stillwell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1978
- Grant v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Long v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Owens v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Owens v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996