Legal Opinion

Shabazz v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1992No. 90-1266PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEADMAN, Associate Judge:

Under the so-called “addict exception” to the District of Columbia’s mandatory-minimum drug sentencing statute, D.C.Code § 33-541(c)(2) (1988), a defendant may be eligible for a lesser sentence if, among other prerequisites, he or she “has not been previously convicted in any jurisdiction in the United States for knowingly or intentionally ... distributing ... a controlled substance....” The appeal before us presents the issue whether a Virginia conviction of distribution “as an accommodation” is a disqualifying conviction under this provision.1

On November 20, 1989,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gooding v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Chambers v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Heacock v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  4. Stillwell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1978
  5. Grant v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Long v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Owens v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Owens v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API