Legal Opinion

Brimhall v. Home Insurance Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1985PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FONES, Justice.

This is a worker’s compensation case in which the trial court found that employee’s injuries did not arise out of and in the course of employment and dismissed plaintiff’s cause of action.

*932The relevant facts are not disputed. On March 7, 1983, plaintiff, Robert Brimhall, was employed as an auto mechanic by Chuck Hutton Chevrolet, a Memphis automobile dealership. On the day preceding his injury, Brimhall observed a co-employee, Donnie Ray, removing a substantial portion of plaintiff’s personal hand cleaner from a container that Brimhall kept near his tools at his work…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thornton v. RCA Service Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Hudson v. Thurston Motor Lines, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  3. W. S. Dickey Manufacturing Co. v. MooreTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Sandlin v. GentryTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Wright v. Gunther Nash Mining Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Orman v. Williams Sonoma, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Wilhelm v. KrogersTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Woods v. Harry B. Woods Plumbing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Ortiz Pérez v. Fondo del Seguro del EstadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994
  5. Anderson v. Save-A-Lot, Ltd.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API