Brimhall v. Home Insurance Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FONES, Justice.
This is a worker’s compensation case in which the trial court found that employee’s injuries did not arise out of and in the course of employment and dismissed plaintiff’s cause of action.
*932The relevant facts are not disputed. On March 7, 1983, plaintiff, Robert Brimhall, was employed as an auto mechanic by Chuck Hutton Chevrolet, a Memphis automobile dealership. On the day preceding his injury, Brimhall observed a co-employee, Donnie Ray, removing a substantial portion of plaintiff’s personal hand cleaner from a container that Brimhall kept near his tools at his work…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thornton v. RCA Service Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949
- Hudson v. Thurston Motor Lines, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1979
- W. S. Dickey Manufacturing Co. v. MooreTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
- Sandlin v. GentryTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
- Wright v. Gunther Nash Mining Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Orman v. Williams Sonoma, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Wilhelm v. KrogersTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Woods v. Harry B. Woods Plumbing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- Ortiz Pérez v. Fondo del Seguro del EstadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994
- Anderson v. Save-A-Lot, Ltd.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.