Woods v. Harry B. Woods Plumbing Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOLDER, Justice.
We granted this workers’ compensation appeal to address two issues: (1) whether the decedent’s death arose out of and in the course of employment; and (2) whether the decedent was the initial aggressor; and if so, whether the aggressor doctrine precluded recovery. We find that the decedent’s death arose out of and in the course of employment. As to the second issue, we hold the common law aggressor defense as it relates to workers’ compensation claims under the Act is abolished in Tennessee and does not bar the decedent’s recovery.
FACTS
The decedent, his nephew and his…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Orman v. Williams Sonoma, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. StevensonTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
- Triad Painting Co. v. BlairSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Partee v. Memphis Concrete Pipe Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1927
- White v. Whiteway Pharmacy, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Curtis v. G.E. Capital Modular SpaceTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
- Wait v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of IllinoisTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Ana R. PADILLA v. TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANYTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- Anderson v. Save-A-Lot, Ltd.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- Doe v. Matthew 25, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2018
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.