Legal Opinion
Flournoy v. Priest
California Supreme Court
Decided July 9, 1971No. Sac. 7900PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
In this proceeding petitioner Houston I. Flournoy, the Controller of the State of California, seeks a writ of mandate to compel respondent Ivy Baker Priest, the Treasurer of the State of California, to register a demand and adopt a resolution providing for the issuance of State of California notes as authorized by sections 17300-17302 of the Government Code. These sections are part of chapter 223 of the Statutes of 1971 (see appendix), which was enacted as an urgency measure and signed by the Governor on June 28, 1971 “to provide an additional means of temporary borrowing to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Davis v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Martin v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Stockburger v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Riley v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Behneman v. Alameda-Contra Costa Transit DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. RobertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Amwest Surety Insurance v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- State Bond Com'n v. ALL TAXPAYERSSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- Taxpayers for Improving Public Safety v. SchwarzeneggerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Pooled Money Investment Board v. UnruhCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.