Legal Opinion

Pooled Money Investment Board v. Unruh

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 16, 1984No. Civ. No. 23182PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PUGLIA, P. J.

This case presents the question whether recently enacted statutory authorization for state borrowing of money to be expended *157for any authorized General Fund purpose transgresses the $300,000 limitation on state indebtedness imposed by article XVI, section 1, of the California Constitution. We hold that it does.

Petitioner Pooled Money Investment Board (Board) consists of the Controller, Treasurer, and Director of Finance of the State of California. (See Gov. Code, § 16480.1.) By majority vote of the Controller and Director of Finance, the Board adopted resolutions directing…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Deukmejian v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. People ex rel. McCullough v. PachecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Veterans' Welfare Board v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Nougues v. DouglassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  5. People ex rel. Attorney Gen. v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Taxpayers for Improving Public Safety v. SchwarzeneggerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API