Stockburger v. Jordan
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
These two causes were argued and submitted together. As they involve the identical legal question, they will be considered and decided in one opinion. The legal question therein presented is whether chapter 304 of the Statutes of 1937 (Stats. 1937, p. 665) is an urgency measure and, therefore, not subject to referendum petition under the terms of section 1, article IV, of the Constitution.
The title to this act is as follows: “An act relating to certain State lands and the production and disposition of oil, gas and other hydrocarbon substances therefrom, providing for the condemnation of real…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arkansas Tax Commission v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Mack v. JastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- State ex rel. Kemper v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
- Wood v. RoachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Carter v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Legislature v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Amwest Surety Insurance v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Davis v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- California Medical Assn. v. BrianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Childs v. GrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.