Legal Opinion

Rogelio M. Salinas v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 25, 2003No. 02-5127PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

The question is whether the Court of Federal Claims correctly dismissed for lack of jurisdiction a government employee’s suit seeking back pay for the period during which he had been suspended following his indictment in a state court. After a jury acquitted him on the state charge, the government reinstated him but refused to give him back pay. He then filed suit in the Court of Federal Claims for amounts allegedly due him for that period. We agree with the Court of Federal Claims that it lacked jurisdiction and therefore we affirm its dismissal of the case.

I

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. James L. Worthington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  3. Curt M. Read v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  4. Edward Richardson and Lorenzo Mosely v. United States Customs ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Salinas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sacco v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Sacco v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  3. De Maio v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. Athey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. Gallo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API