Legal Opinion
James L. Worthington v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 21, 1999No. 98-5160PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
The United States Court of Federal Claims dismissed James L. Worthington’s claim for overtime pay under the Back Pay Act for lack of jurisdiction. See Worthington v. United States, 41 Fed. Cl. 181 (1998). Based on its determination that the Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA) covers Worthington’s claim, the trial court decided that the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB or Board) has exclusive jurisdiction. Because the MSPB does not have jurisdiction over Worthington’s claim and his claim otherwise falls within the jurisdictional grant of the Tucker Act, this court reverses…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- The United States v. Patrick J. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Romero v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Daryl C. McClary v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Stephen Bosco, Charles L. Davis, Ray Dean Williams, John M. Wolf, and All Similarly Situated Individuals v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Nabisco, Inc. v. PF Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Nyunt v. Chairman, Broadcasting Board of GovernorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Dangfeng Shen Ho v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Grosdidier v. Chairman, Broadcasting Board of GovernorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Hufford v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.