Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Athey v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 31, 2015No. 99-2051C, 06-872CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lump-Sum Payment for Annual Leave; 5 U.S.C. §§ 5551-5553; 5 C.F.R. § 550.1202; Back Pay Act; Interest; 5 U.S.C. § 5596; 5 C.F.R. § 550.803

OPINION AND ORDER

CAMPBELL-SMITH, Chief Judge

Pending before the court are two class actions, Athey v. United States, 78 Fed.Cl. 157 (2007), and Kandel v. United States, 85 Fed.Cl. 437 (2009), comprised of former federal civilian employees of a variety of agencies who retired, died, or separated from federal civilian service at different times, during the years 1993 through 1999. Upon separation, these individuals were statutorily entitled to lump-sum…

2Cases cited106 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Athey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  2. Alimanestianu v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  3. Athey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  4. Athey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  5. Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API