Legal Opinion

De Maio v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 28, 2010No. 09-875CPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

WHEELER, Judge.

In this action, pro se Plaintiff Louis J. De Maio asserts that his former employer, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), wrongfully terminated his employment and engaged in criminal conduct by refusing to enroll him in the Federal Employees Health Benefits (“FEHB”) program following his removal. Mr. De Maio requests the Court to reinstate him to “civil service status” with the IRS and to re-enroll him in the FEHB program. Mr. De Maio also seeks back pay and recovery of excess insurance premiums he allegedly paid after he was…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bussie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. Outlaw v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Wolfchild v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. Mission Essential Personnel, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Holmes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API