Legal Opinion
Salinas v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 25, 2002No. 00-30CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Senior Judge.
This case is before the court on defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. Defendant’s motion asserts that plaintiffs claim should be dismissed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(4) of this court for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. After reviewing the briefs, the court hereby GRANTS defendant’s motion because this court lacks jurisdiction to hear the case.
FACTS
Plaintiff Rogelio Salinas is a Border Patrol Agent stationed in the Laredo Sector of Texas. Plaintiff joined the Border Patrol in 1988 after 15 years in the Air Force. After conferring with the Border…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- The United States v. Patrick J. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- James L. Worthington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Joseph C. Spagnola, Jr. v. David Stockman, Director, Office of Management and BudgetCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Jankowitz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sacco v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Rogelio M. Salinas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Agee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Zaccardelli v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005