Murphy v. Murphy
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
A general demurrer to the complaint was' interposed by the defendants and it was sustained without leave to amend as to Alice K. Murphy and overruled as to S. S. Murphy. From the judgment of dismissal in favor of said Alice K. Murphy, following the order sustaining her demurrer, the appeal has been taken. From the complaint it appears that plaintiff is the daughter of S. S. Murphy by a former marriage; that on April 26, 1911, she obtained -a judgment against him for her maintenance and support in the sum of $15 per month and that the amount due under said judgment is $930, as principal, and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Murray v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Prince v. LambCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Clopton v. CloptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Walsh v. MckeenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Whyte v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Saint v. SaintCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Johnson v. National Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Bailey Trading Co. v. LevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Ahmanson Bank & Trust Co. v. TepperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.