Legal Opinion

Bailey Trading Co. v. Levy

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 17, 1925No. Docket No. 2807PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This action is for damages for the breach of a general warranty, as provided by section 1771 of the Civil Code, that a certain quantity of milo purchased by plaintiffs from defendant was, at the time of said sale, in a sound and merchantable condition.

The defendant demurred to the first amended complaint on both general and special grounds, and the court sustained the demurrer, without leave to amend, and thereupon rendered judgment dismissing the action.

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from said judgment.

The complaint, as amended, alleges:

“That at the City of Corning, in the County of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Barnard v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Prince v. LambCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Philbrook v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Himmelman v. DanosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Stewart v. DouglassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Haddad v. McDowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Vogel v. Thrifty Drug Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Saint v. SaintCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Integrated, Inc. v. Alec Fergusson Electrical ContractorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Lester v. IsaacCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API