Murray v. Murray
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. J. R Webb, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Britt, C.
Plaintiff having been deserted by her husband, the defendant Owen Murray, she instituted this action against him for maintenance, without divorce, and to set aside certain transfers of property made by him to his brother, the defendant James Murray, which obstruct the enforcement of her right. Both defendants being absent from the state— said James residing .in Canada—summons was served on them by publication and mailing as prescribed by statute. They failed *270to appear, and plaintiff obtained judgment, from which defendants appeal. In the printed transcript appears a paper entitled “…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Arndt v. GriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- De la Montanya v. De la MontanyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Brown v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Galland v. GallandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Feigley v. FeigleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Pennington v. Fourth National Bank of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Simmons v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Artman v. ArtmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Goodwine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.