Legal Opinion
Staley v. McClurken
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 27, 1939No. Civ. 6263PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, J. —
The defendant, J. A. McClurken, has appealed from a judgment of $316.69 which was rendered against him in a suit for conversion of personal property. Another person was joined as defendant, but has not appealed from the judgment.
It is contended the findings and judgment are not supported by the evidence, chiefly because a large portion of the claim was based on assignments of choses in action by other persons who were the owners of portions of the property at the time of the conversion; and that the complaint fails to state a cause of action for the same reason. It is also urged…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Poggi v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Burke v. MaguireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Difani v. Riverside County Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
- McCaffey C. Co., Inc. v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. DallasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Glogau v. HaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Dep't of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Momand v. Twentieth-Century Fox Film CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1941
- Vaughn v. Dame Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.