Legal Opinion

Mutz v. Municipal Boundary Commission

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1984No. 14983PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALTERS, Justice.

In October 1981 the Town of Red River (Red River) applied, under NMSA 1978, Sections 3-7-11 to 3-7-16 (Repl.Pamp. 1981), to annex certain territory. Included in its petition was the following described land belonging to Petitioners:

All of Blocks 210, 220, 230, 240, 250, and 260;

Lots 4 through 22, Block 270;

Lots 1 through 7, the 42 feet of Lots 13

and 14 and Lots 15 through 22, Block 280;

jj! # * * *

Lots 10 through 12, Block 410;

All of Lots 420, 430, 440, 450, 460, 470 and 480;

Notice of public hearing was published as required by Section 3-7-14(B), and the hearing was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Martinez v. Research Park, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Duke City Lumber Co. v. New Mexico Environmental Improvement BoardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  3. City of Santa Fe v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Llano, Inc. v. Southern Union Gas CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Olson v. RothwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Rio Grande Chapter of the Sierra Club v. New Mexico Mining CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Miller v. New Mexico Department of TransportationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State Ex Rel. Stratton v. Gurley Motor Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. City of Albuquerque v. State Ex Rel. Village of Los Ranchos De AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. McMillan v. Allstate Indemnity Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API