Legal Opinion
City of Burlingame v. County of San Mateo
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 18, 1949No. Civ. 13840; Civ. 13841PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
Two appeals are here consolidated, one from a judgment in a quo warranto proceeding, entered in favor of the State of California on relation of Robert E. Ferranti holding the annexation to the appellant city of Burlingame of certain uninhabited territory to be void, and the other from a judgment dismissing a petition for writ of re,view filed by appellant city of Burlingame against the county of San Mateo and its board of supervisors to test the jurisdiction of proceedings looking to the incorporation of the city of Millbrae.
On August 1, 1946, Mills Estate, Incorporated, filed a petition…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Peck v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- People Ex Rel. Russell v. Town of LoyaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- People Ex Rel. City of Pasadena v. City of Monterey ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- State ex rel. Hunter v. Town of HessvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
- People Ex Rel. McGroarty v. City of AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
3Cited by35 opinions
- American Distilling Co. v. City Council of SausalitoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- People Ex Rel. Averna v. City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- People Ex Rel. Forde v. Town of Corte MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Johnson v. City of San PabloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Portland General Electric Co. v. City of EstacadaOregon Supreme Court · 1952
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.