In re Goepfrich
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLenROOt, Judge
This appeal is from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting for lack of patentability over the cited jorior art-claims 1 to 5, inclusive, and 10 of appellant’s application for a patent. No' claims were allowed.
Claims 2 and 4 are illustrative and read as follows:
2. A brake comprising, in combination with a drum and with anchorage and applying means including a pair of wheel cylinders at opposite sides of the brake, a pair of brake shoes each of which is acted on separately by pressure in both of the wheel…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Application of Philip A. Shaffer, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Calhoun v. State Chemical Manufacturing CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1957
- Application of Ralph L. Young and Kingsley E. Humbert, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Application of Benjamin Gruskin, Deceased, by Irma Kelly GruskinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Application of Fred N. HillCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.