Legal Opinion

In re Goepfrich

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 1, 1943No. 4774PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenROOt, Judge

This appeal is from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting for lack of patentability over the cited jorior art-claims 1 to 5, inclusive, and 10 of appellant’s application for a patent. No' claims were allowed.

Claims 2 and 4 are illustrative and read as follows:

2. A brake comprising, in combination with a drum and with anchorage and applying means including a pair of wheel cylinders at opposite sides of the brake, a pair of brake shoes each of which is acted on separately by pressure in both of the wheel…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Application of Philip A. Shaffer, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  2. Calhoun v. State Chemical Manufacturing CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1957
  3. Application of Ralph L. Young and Kingsley E. Humbert, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  4. Application of Benjamin Gruskin, Deceased, by Irma Kelly GruskinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  5. Application of Fred N. HillCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API