Gentiluomo v. Runswick Bowling & Billiards Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Joseph A. Gentiluomo appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York granting summary judgment of invalidity of Gentiluomo’s U.S. Reissue Patent 34,614. Gentiluomo v. Brunswick Bowling & Billiards Corp., No. 96-cv-544 (N.D.N.Y. Nov. 1, 1999). For the reasons set forth below, we affirm-in-part and reverse-in-part.
BACKGROUND
Mr. Gentiluomo is the sole inventor and owner of the ’614 patent, which is directed to a bowling ball having an increased total kinetic energy output. According to the written description of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Wms Gaming Inc. v. International Game TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- George Zelinski, Jr. And Pin Breaker, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Columbia 300, Inc., a Texas Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Kali Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
- Gentiluomo v. Brunswick Bowling & Billiards Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- George Zelinski, Jr. And Pin Breaker, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Columbia 300, Inc., a Texas Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Zelinski, George v. Columbia 300 IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003