Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Kali Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LIFLAND, District Judge.
In these two consolidated patent infringement actions, Defendant generic drug manufacturers Kali Laboratories, Inc. (“Kali”), Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. (collectively “Par”), 1 Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (collectively “Teva”), and Barr Laboratories, Inc. (“Barr”), 2 move for summary judgment against Plaintiff Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. (“Ortho-McNeil”). Ortho-McNeil asserts that Defendants have infringed, under the Hatch-Waxman Act, its patent covering the pain-relief drug it…
2Cases cited87 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Mitsubishi Chemical Corp. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Daiichi Sankyo Co. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Hamilton Products, Inc. v. O'NeillDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2007