A.B.C. Distributing Co. v. City & County of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHARDSON, J.
In these two consolidated appeals we consider the validity of a San Francisco ordinance which imposes a 1 percent payroll expense tax upon persons engaging one or more employees to perform services in San Francisco. Plaintiffs, wholesale liquor and beer distributors doing business in San Francisco, contend that the payroll expense tax ordinance may not validly apply to them since (1) article XX, section 22, of the California Constitution has reserved to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control the exclusive power to collect license or occupation taxes on account of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bishop v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Rivera v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Gillum v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Ainsworth v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Brock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Weekes v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Marsh & McLennan of California, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Liberati v. Bristol Bay BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- The Pines v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.