Legal Opinion
United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. McGraw-Hill Companies
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 4, 2005No. 05-235 (RCL)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This matter comes before this Court on Applicant’s Motion [1] for an Order Requiring Compliance with Administrative Subpoena, 1 filed June 16, 2005. Applicant (“CFTC”) seeks an order from this Court requiring The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (“McGraw-Hill”) to comply with an administrative subpoena duces tecum that the CFTC served upon McGraw-Hill on April 15, 2005 (the “Subpoena”). In a Memorandum in Opposition to Applicant’s Motion filed July 15, 2005, McGraw-Hill objects to the Subpoena on the grounds that it cannot be compelled to reveal…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Zerilli v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Mark v. Shoen v. Leonard Samuel Shoen, Edward J. Shoen v. Leonard Samuel Shoen, Ronald J. WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. McGraw-Hill CompaniesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Estate of Esther Klieman v. Palestinian AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Donald Trump v. Mazars USA, LLPCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- In re Natural Gas Commodity LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.