Legal Opinion

In re Natural Gas Commodity Litigation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 16, 2005No. 03 Civ.6186 VM AJPPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

PECK, United States Chief Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiffs have moved to compel the production of documents from non-parties McGraw-Hill Companies and Intelligence Press, Inc. (collectively, “the Publications”) pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 45. (Dkt. No. 310: Pis. Notice of Motion.) For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

FACTS

The Underlying Action

The facts pertaining to the underlying action have been set forth in Judge Marrero’s opinions denying defendants’ motion to dismiss and granting plaintiffs’ motion to certify the class. In re…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Shirley Small v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. Floyd Frank v. Sally B. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  4. Orlando Roldan v. James Racette, Superintendent, Adirondack Correctional Facility, and U.S. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  5. IUE AFL-CIO Pension Fund v. HerrmannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
  2. U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  3. In re Natural Gas Commodities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  4. Sagi Genger and TPR Investment Associates, Inc. v. Orly GengerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API