Legal Opinion

Mark v. Shoen v. Leonard Samuel Shoen, Edward J. Shoen v. Leonard Samuel Shoen, Ronald J. Watkins

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 27, 1993No. 92-16573PublishedCited by 174 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM A. NORRIS, Circuit Judge:

This appeal presents the question whether an investigative author, at work on a forthcoming book, may be compelled to testify and produce notes and tape recordings of interviews he conducted with a source who happens to be a defendant in a defamation action. We hold, under the circumstances of this ease, that he may not.

I

Appellant Ronald Watkins is an investigative author of books on topical and controversial subjects. He became involved in this defamation action because of his work on a forthcoming non-fiction book about a long and bitter family feud over…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by174 opinions

  1. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Flamingo Trails No. 7 Landscape Maintenance Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2016
  2. Microsoft Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  3. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces TecumCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  4. Republic of Ecuador v. Douglas MacKayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Albert Gonzales and Mary Gonzales, Deputy Darrell Pierce v. National Broadcasting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999

169 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API