Legal Opinion
Estate of Esther Klieman v. Palestinian Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 19, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2004-1173PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
On April 10, 2012, Magistrate Judge John Facciola issued a memorandum order deny ing plaintiffs’ motion to compel a nonparty news organization to produce subpoenaed audiovisual recordings and provide a deposition witness, and granting the news organization’s motion to quash. This matter is now before the Court on plaintiffs’ objection to the magistrate judge’s decision. After careful consideration of the challenged order, the parties’ memoranda, the relevant legal authorities, and the entire record in this ease, the Court finds that the magistrate…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Zerilli v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Food Lion, Incorporated v. United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio-Clc, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-ClcCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Edward L. Carey v. Britt Hume, Jack AndersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Northrop Corporation v. McDonnell Douglas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- ['Cartagena v. Centerpoint Nine, Inc.']District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Goldberg v. Amgen, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Wultz v. Bank of China Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Chen v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Estate of Esther Klieman v. Palestinian AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.