Legal Opinion
United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. McGraw-Hill Companies
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 2, 2005No. 05-235 (RCL)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This matter comes before this Court on Respondent’s Motion [16] to Clarify this Court’s October 4, 2005 Order. In that Order, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (“McGraw-Hill”), was ordered to comply with an administrative subpoena duces tecum issued by the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), as modified by this Court. Respondent now returns to this Court in search of an order clarifying and further modifying the same subpoena, as well as ordering the imposition of a protective order. The CFTC filed an Opposition [17] on November 7, 2005,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Sarah Kattan, by Her Parents and Next Friends Susan J. Thomas and Joseph Kattan, and Cross-Appellants v. District of Columbia, and Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Taylor v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. McGraw-Hill CompaniesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mohammadi v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Slate v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. Productos Lacteos Tocumbo S.A. De C.V.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Smith v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Johnson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.