Legal Opinion
Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Litchfield Mutual Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 19, 2005No. 17146, 17147PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
These appeals arise from an action in which the plaintiffs, Hartford Casualty Insurance Company (Hartford Casualty) and Mitch Wylie, sought a declaratory judgment that the defendant, Litchfield Mutual Fire Insurance Company, had a duty both to defend and to indemnify Wylie pursuant to an insurance policy that it had issued to Wylie. Upon their appeals following our grants of certification, the defendant challenges the Appellate Court’s judgment concluding in part that the defendant had a duty to indemnify Wylie, and the plaintiffs challenge the Appellate Court’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fitzpatrick v. American Honda Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- QSP, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Black v. Goodwin, Loomis & Britton, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Moore v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Flint v. Universal Machine Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. FontaineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- ACMAT Corp. v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Belz v. Peerless InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Vermont Mutual Insurance v. WalukiewiczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Middlesex Insurance v. MaraDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.