Legal Opinion

Markus v. Trumbull County Board of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1970No. 69-491PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeebebt, J.

Where statutory provisions relative to the submission of a referendum to the voters have not been complied with, that submission may be enjoined. Cf. Cincinnati v. Hillenbrand (1921), 103 Ohio St. 286, 133 N. E. 556; Pfeifer v. Graves (1913), 88 Ohio St. 473, 104 N. E. 529.

The petitions involved in this case were filed pursuant to R. C. 519.12, which requires that they be filed with the board of township trustees within 30 days after the adoption of the zoning amendment, that they be “signed by a number of qualified voters residing in the unincorporated area of the township or part thereof…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dillon v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Mills v. CowgillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. State Ex Rel. Poor v. AddisonOhio Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Prosen v. DuffyOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  5. State ex rel. Stillo v. GwinOhio Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sinay v. SoddersOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Christy v. Summit County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. McCord v. Delaware County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State ex rel. Rose v. Lorain County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Shelly & Sands, Inc. v. Franklin County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1984

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API