Legal Opinion

State v. Steffen

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1994No. Nos. 86-193, 86-512, 86-642, 86-1130, 86-1499, 86-1597, 87-243, 87-447, 88-1079 and 88-1286PublishedCited by 350 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

The constitutions and courts of our country have established procedural safeguards reflecting our society’s concern for the rights of citizens accused of committing crimes. When those safeguards are used to thwart judgments rendered pursuant to the procedures, it is predictable that citizens will lose confidence in the ability of the criminal justice system to enforce its judgments. The propriety of the ultimate criminal sentence — the death penalty — has been and will continue to be a subject of vigorous and passionate debate. The death penalty evokes the full spectrum of human reason,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by350 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. GondorOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. BeyOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997

345 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API