Legal Opinion
Rutigliano v. Valley Business Forms
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 27, 1996No. Civil Action 90-1432 (JCL)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LIFLAND, District Judge.
Plaintiff Nancy Rutigliano initiated this action in 1990 against various manufacturers and distributors of carbonless carbon paper (“CCP”) forms. Rutigliano alleges that she has developed a condition called “formaldehyde sensitization” from exposure to formaldehyde released from CCP she handled in the course of her employment at Metro Fuel Oil Company (“Metro”) in Ridgefield, New Jersey from January 1984 through December 1985. Formaldehyde sensitization, she claims, is a severe and permanent disability which requires her to five and work in environments free of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In Re Breast Implant LitigationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1998
- Hall v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 1996
- Farris v. Intel Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2007
- In re Consolidated Parlodel LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Milanowicz v. Raymond Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.