Legal Opinion
In re Consolidated Parlodel Litigation
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 6, 1998No. Civil Action No. 95-1935PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORLOFSKY, District Judge.
Sixteen female Plaintiffs, some joined by their husbands, have filed fourteen separate actions alleging that they were injured as a result of taking the prescription drug Parlo-*443del. Plaintiffs hale from a variety of states across the country1 and allege a variety of injuries, including strokes, heart attacks and seizures, occurring from 1988 to 1994. Defendant, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (“NPC”), formerly known as Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corporation, designed, manufactured, marketed and distributed Parlo-del.
Following transfer of several of these cases…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Ferens v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- John E. Johnson and H/w Ann Marie Johnson v. The Celotex Corporation, Owens-Illinois, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Aubrey Hendrix v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Doug Brady, Inc. v. New Jersey Building Laborers Statewide FundsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- American Bankers Ins. Co. of Florida v. AlexanderMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
- Soldo v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Banacki v. OneWest Bank, FSBDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
- A.F.I.K. Holding SPRL v. FassDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.