Legal Opinion
Farris v. Intel Corp.
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided March 14, 2007No. CIV 06-0130 BB/DJSPublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BLACK, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Intel Corporation’s (“Defendant”) July 28, 2006 motion to strike (Doc. No. 16), Defendant’s September 12, 2006 Daubert motion (Doc. No. 27), Defendant’s November 15, 2006 motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 35), and Plaintiff Robert Farris’ (“Plaintiff’) November 20, 2006 motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. No. 37). Having reviewed the submissions of the parties and the relevant law, the Court finds that Defendant’s motion to strike should be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, Defendant’s Dau-bert…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Palmer v. Asarco Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2007
- Firstenberg v. MonribotNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- Gonzales v. Saul Ewing, LLP (In Re Vaughan)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
- Aldrete v. Wal-Mart SupercenterDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
- Aldrete v. Wal-Mart SupercenterDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2021
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.