Legal Opinion
City of Santa Barbara v. Petras
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 24, 1971No. Civ. 37153PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COBEY, Acting P. J.
The property owners, Petras et al., appeal from a judgment in condemnation in the amount of $175,000. The sole question is whether the trial, court was correct in excluding from evidence the fact that the lease on the property obligated the lessee, the Bank of America, 1 to remodel extensively the building on the property.
The trial court based its ruling upon the' last sentence of Code of Civil Procedure, section 1249 which, since 1872, has read: “No improvements put upon the property subsequent to the date of the service of summons shall be included in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Citizens Utilities Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Lynbar, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. MurataCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Redevelopment Agency v. MaxwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- South Bay Irrigation District v. California-American Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Escondido Union School District v. Casa Sueños De Oro, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Saratoga Fire Protection District v. HackettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- People v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Simon Newman Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.