People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Murata
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in an eminent domain proceeding following a second trial by jury. The first judgment, on plaintiff’s appeal, was reversed for errors of law committed by the trial court: (1) failure to give cautionary instructions relative to sales to condemners; (2) re*4fusai to admit into evidence certain photographs of the property offered by plaintiff; and (3) restriction of plaintiff’s cross-examination of defendants’ expert witnesses on property values. (People ex rel. Dept, of Public Works v. Murata, 161 Cal.App.2d 369 [326 P.2d 947].)
The sole question presented is…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Clements v. T. R. Bechtel Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Freedland v. GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- In Re AlpineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Goldtree v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Metropolitan Water District v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Ferraro v. Southern California Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1980
- Cody v. Justice CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Peninsula Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. MascottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.