Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Dunn

California Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1956No. L. A. 23936PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

Defendant owners have appealed from a judgment condemning two parcels of land for highway purposes. Parcel 1 consisted of several lots at the end of an unimproved block owned by defendants, and Parcel 2 consisted of two lots separated from Parcel 1 by an intervening street. The owners commenced construction of a garage on Parcel 2 about August 1, 1953, and assertedly spent some $12,000 on the building prior to commencement of this action. On August 19 the Highway Commission adopted a resolution determining that public interest and necessity required the condemnation of the two parcels, and on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Long Beach City High School District v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. City of Stockton v. EllingwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. City of Los Angeles v. DeaconCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. De Freitas v. Town of Suisun CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. ZuckermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. SilveiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District Ex Rel. State Reclamation Board v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API