Legal Opinion

United States v. Ortiz

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided July 2, 1991No. ACMR 9001665PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

De GIULIO, Senior Judge:

Appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of officers. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of two specifications of indecent acts with his natural daughter in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. He was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for eight years, total forfeitures, a reprimand, and reduction to Private El. The convening authority approved a sentence of a dishonorable discharge, confinement for five years, and reduction to Private El.

Appellan…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. BrannanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  5. United States v. CastilloUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. OrtizUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  2. United States v. JenkinsArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
  3. United States v. GodfreyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
  4. United States v. RudolphU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API